Day Sixteen Class Notes

Check your Wikipedia Article
Have your edits and revisiosn remained? If they have changed, what has changed? Do you know why there were changes made to your edits and revisions? Take a moment to check the talk/discussion page, too.

Editing sweep
Take 10 minutes to review and edit your revision.

Class Evaluation
Answer the following questions in the D2L Discussion component

What learning tools were effective? (Consider D2L Discussions, written peer responses, spoken peer responses, large group critiques of rough drafts, evaluating sources, learning how to navigate Wikipedia, using the course wiki, conducting research (for your project; for a classmate's project), having the lessons and assignments on the course blog, having the assignment deadlines embedded in the D2L course news, the instructor's audio comments, and so on.)

What learning tools were less effective?

Review the course goals - identify two of the goals which you were able to achieve and briefly describe how you achieved them - identify one goal that has remained elusive.

Evaluations of the Persuasive Analytical Essay revisions will be completed by the end of the work day on Monday, July 27. I will send you the scoring rubric as an email attachment. Within the email, I will indicate your final grade for the course. You will have 24 hours to contact me to address any discrepancies in your grade before I post the final grades to the registrar on Tuesday, July 28.

[photo: Albert feared the finality of completion by zen]

Day Fifteen Assignments

Revise and post your Persuasive Analytical Essay Revision. (Be sure to scroll to the bottom of the page to find the "revision" listing; don't post the revision in the "small peer response group" section.)

Michael will be available in his office (Helland Center, Room 4141) to respond to drafts and revisions between 12:00 and 3:00 pm on Tuesday, July 21. Send your revisions and drafts to him as email attachments (Michael.Kuhne@minneapolis.edu). If you wish to make an appointment to meet with him, please do so (rather than showing up unexpectedly).

Day Fifteen Class Notes

Instructor-led Writing Workshop - addressing common issues (25)

• establishing clear thesis statements (nuanced and nuanced; hint at essay's structure)
• establishing effective analytical body paragraphs (claim-evidence-explanation-closing)
• incorporating sources accurately and effectively (introducing the source-signal phrase-S?P?DQ?-in-text citation)
• making good use of the Wikipedia Article revising and editing experience
  

Small peer response group conferences (45)

• One person volunteers to have his or her draft to discussed.
• A different person volunteers to begin discussing the draft.
• At minimum, each person should discuss the draft's thesis statement, the body paragraph's topic sentence, the use of evidence (especially how well or how poorly the writer explains how the evidence supports the claim), and the conclusion.
• When everyone has had a chance to discuss the draft and the writer's questions of the group have been answered, move on to the next draft.

Submitting the Persuasive Analytical Essay revision. (10)


Class will end once these activities are completed. You will be free to leave. You are also welcomed to stay and work in the classroom on your revision. The instructor will stay in the classroom and be available for consultations until the end of class.

Day Fourteen Assignments

• Review and comment to the drafts posted within your small peer response group.
• Continue revising and editing your own Persuasive Analytical Essay.
• The revision of the Persuasive Analytical Essay is due by the beginning of Day Sixteen.

Day Fourteen Class Notes

Wikipedia Article - evaluated (check D2L); scoring rubrics and comments sent later this afternoon.

Take 5 minutes - check your Wikipedia article: has anything changed since you made the edits/revisions?

Persuasive Analytical Essay Rough Drafts (20)

• return to the wiki page where you posted the rough draft
• click "edit," scroll to the bottom of the screen
• in a short writing (2-3 sentences) address the most challenging aspect of this assignment
• also, write three questions for your peer reviewers - the more specific the question, the better

Discuss

Large Group Response and Norming Activity

• Review Response Guidelines (5)
• Cecilia's draft (25)

Drafting an accurate Works Cited page for the final essay (15)
--See "Preparing the list of works cited" at the bottom of MLA Manuscript Format
--MLA List of Works Cited - Hacker's Documentation Page
--Questions about Works Cited

Work Time(60)
You may use this time either to continue writing your own draft OR to begin commenting on your peer's draft.
There will be time for small peer response group conferences on Day Fifteen

Day Thirteen Assignments

Post your rough draft on the course wiki in the Persuasive Analytical essay rough draft and revision wiki page. This must be posted prior to the beginning of class on Day Fourteen.

Day Thirteen Class Notes

Reflection on the Wikipedia Article assignment (20)

• what did you enjoy?
• did anything surprise you?
• what was frustrating?
• would you describe the research that you had to do for the article as similar to or different from the research that you have done in the past? how so? in what ways?
• what did you learn?

Review Persuasive Analytical writing assignment (and calendar) (15)

• One might revise either the Wikipedia Debate or the Wikipedia Feature Article Analysis essay for the Persuasive Analytical essay IF the revision meets the guidelines (primarily the new, extended 1250-word limit)
• Remember: the new persuasive position articulated in the thesis should be nuanced (not over-simplified)
• You can also develop a new essay, as long as it focuses on Wikipedia and meets the assignment's requirements
• We strongly recommend that whatever you write addresses your experience as a Wikipedian. This can be either the focus of the final essay or a smaller section.
• In the final essay, a higher quality standard will be applied to various writing items such as thesis statements (with sub-claims); body paragraph development (claim-evidence-explanation-closing); the accurate and effective use of sources (introducing the source, using signal phrases, formatting the direct quote correctly, using accurate in-text citations, and signalling the use of summaries and paraphrases where necessary), MLA Works Cited accuracy, and overall quality of the writing.

Thesis and sub-claim work for the final writing assignment (35)
Some questions that might lead to a more nuanced approach:

• In your experience working with Wikipedia in this class, what were some of your most frustrating moments? Why were these moments frustrating? How did they affect your thinking about Wikipedia or its use?
• In your experience working with Wikipedia in this class, what were some of your most rewarding or fun moments? Why were these moments rewarding or fun? How did they affect your thinking about Wikipedia or its use?
• If you had to tell someone what you like about this class, what would it be? Why?
• If you had to tell someone what you don't like about this class, what would it be? Why?
• How has learning more about Wikipedia changed the way you think about it?
• How has learning more about Wikipedia changed the way you use it?
• If there were one thing you could change about Wikipedia, what would it be?
• If there were one thing you would never change about Wikipedia what would it be?

Discuss

Given your understanding of the assignment, revise or draft your working thesis statement Share this one other person: as readers of your peer's working thesis statement, ask yourselves these questions:

• is the thesis nuanced (not over-simplified)?
• is the thesis arguable?
• can you predict what the structure of the essay will be based on the thesis statement?

Once you have consulted with a peer, received feedback, and made the necessary revisions, please write your working thesis on the whiteboard.

Review working thesis statements

Organizing the Persuasive Analytical essay (30)

Based on the working thesis statement, create a list of potential sub-claims.

Scrap Paper Evidence activity(based on one sub-claim)

Writer identifies a claim in need of (better) evidence

--your name
--the name of the Wikipedia article you are discussing
--the claim for which you need better evidence

Instructor gathers and re-distributes to students working in pairs

Partners must then find evidence for the claim

When complete, partners return scrap - with evidence - to the original writer-- and discuss

Once the scrap paper has been returned, develop a working outline of your essay:

• include the introduction (working thesis, plus brainstorm ideas for a lead)
• include all of the sub-claims (plus supporting evidence, if available)
• include the conclusion (tentative offerings acceptable)

Drafting an accurate Works Cited page for the final essay (15)

• See "Preparing the list of works cited" at the bottom of MLA Manuscript Format
• MLA List of Works Cited - Hacker's Documentation Page
• Questions about Works Cited

Volunteers for Norming?

Drafting time (35)

Day Twelve Assignments

1.) Finish all of the work on the Wikipedia article assignment by the beginning of class on Monday, July 13.

2). Use the "Sample Format for Collaboration Page" to guide your organization of information on your collaboration page.

Day Twelve Class Notes

Housekeeping and formatting of collaboration pages

Collaboration pages must include

• updated and identifiable action plan
• 4 evaluated articles with Works Cited entries
• 3 clearly identified sub criteria
• links to all wikipedia article edits with justifications/explanations
• text that was changed as part of the "Add or substantially revise (add or rewrite a paragraph at least four sentences long) a section of the article" criterion

Look at current pages and brainstorm formatting ideas.

Demonstration of adding images

Okay, it's not as hard as we thought-- if you took the image yourself or someone gave you permission to use it. If it isn't your image, then it is hard because of the legal issues, not the technical ones.

Here's what you need to do:

• http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Welcome --login on this page (top right of page); your wikipedia login should work-- if not, create a new account (top right of page)
• Click upload file on the left after you get logged in
• Click "entirely my own work"
• scroll down the page and fill in the information (click the question marks next to the text boxes to get more information on what goes in the box. You do not have to fill-in all the boxes)
• Obviously, start with the "local filename" box by browsing to your computer and finding the image (be sure to give the file a descriptive name while it is still on your computer)
  
• You do have to fill-in the license box: my suggestion is to go with the recommended license (Multi-license with CC-BY-SA-3.0 and GFDL); however, you should know that you are giving away almost all rights to the image-- but this is what you need to do if you really want to share it.
• you should choose a category to make the image easier for others to find (and you too if you lose it later!); you'll need to read about categories to get the idea of them
• click "Upload file"
• shout "woo-hoo" like Homer Simpson when the file finishes uplaoding

Now,to put it in your Wikipedia article

• view this page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Images_help (it's a good bit of information, but you need to read it because it allows different ways of formatting the images on the page)
• Because your image is in Wikimedia Commons, the Image tag will pull it directly into the Wikipedia page (sweet!)
• I edited the MCTC page and added a picture using the following tag: [[Image:MCTC_Technical_building.jpgthumbleftThe Technical Building on the MCTC/Metro State campus as seen from Loring Park]]-- this pulls a small (thumb) version of the image into the page from Wikimedia Commons, floats it to the left of the text, and puts a caption under it -- go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minneapolis_Community_and_Technical_College to see what it looks like
• If you click on the file it goes to the full-size image-- it does that automatically (more sweet!)
• Caveats: 1) when placing images, do it by editing the sections of the page, not by using the "edit this page" tab at the top; 2) image file names are case sensitive, so make sure you get the image name right

So, go forth and try to make Wikipedia more image-y.

Continue Wikipedia article work in class

Intro to Persuasive Analytical Essay assignment

Read and ask questions in comment section of wiki page

Discuss

• Brainstorm nuanced argument
• Share ideas
• Respond
• Brainstorm again and refine

[photo: Sharing by furiousgeorge81]

Day Eleven Assignments

These assignments are due by the beginning of class on Day Twelve:

• Date these additions "July 8" on your Collaboration Page
• Establish the 3 sub-criteria that you will address
• Identify the section of the Wikipedia article where you will provide the addtional four sentences (minimum) of text
• Provide a minimum of two more sources, that you must evaluate (criteria for evaluating internet sources: make sure that you address the authorship, the accuracy of the information, the goals of the site, and access)
• Add to Wikipedia Resources page

Day Eleven Class Notes

Revisions (5)

• Revisions of the Wikipedia Debate article were due today by 11:59 am
• Revisions of the Wikipedia Feature Article Analysis are due by 11:59 am on Wednesday, July 8.

Housekeeping (5)
When you make an edit to your Wikipedia article, place a link to that revision on your collaboration page

(Find the revision by going to the history page and clicking the link for "cur" - meaning "current"- at the beginning of the line for that revision).

Editing round-up (15)
Having evaluated the Wikipedia Feature Article Analysis revision, it is time to address a few stylistic hiccups:

• then/than
• etc.
• its/it's
• there/their/they're
• cite/site/sight
• indefinite you/they
• semi-colon (;) and colon (:)
• parallel structure

Capturing the Process and Responding to the Wikipedia Article criteria (10)

• Date these additions "July 8" in your Collaboration Page
• Establish the 3 sub-criteria that you will address
• Identify the section of the Wikipedia article where you will provide the addtional four sentences (minimum) of text
• Provide a minimum of two more sources, that you must evaluate (criteria for evaluating internet sources: make sure that you address the authorship, the accuracy of the information, the goals of the site, and access)

Time to Work on the Wikipedia Article Assignment (Revisions and Edits due at the beginning of Day 13) (70)

Sharing Challenges (20)

Using the main workstation, groups share challenges they are experiencing as they edit Wikipedia Articles Feedback and suggestions from class

Add to Wikipedia Resources page

Day Ten Assignments

For next class

1) If you haven't already completed Summary Practice 1 and Paraphrase Practice 1 in the Discussion section of D2L, do so by the end of today's class (7/1)

2) Come to class prepared to share with the class on the big screen one problem you or your group is experiencing with the Wikipedia revision/editing process

3) Continue the editing process (this is key - don't rely only on the designated class time to conduct the revision and editing work)

The Wikipedia article task must be completed by the beginning of class on Wednesday, July 8.

Day Ten Class Notes

Housekeeping (15)
Please write your name and the Wikipedia user name (just your user name, not your password) you are using for this class on the piece of paper that is coming around

Look at Wikipedia Resources and ask questions

Wikipedia Article Scoring Rubric (10)
Review the Wikipedia Article scoring rubric and discuss questions

Create/Revise your Action Plan (20)

• For today, you were to have created a list of 3-4 "things" that you needed to do to improve the Wikipedia article of your choosing.
• Based on the requirements outlined in the scoring rubric, revise your action plan on the collaboration page.
• Based on work done since Monday, note which parts of your plan you have already completed (leave these items on the collaboration page-- just write "completed by [name] on [date]" next to them)
• Based on the scoring rubric, list new actions for plan, who will complete them, and the proposed date for completion
• Discuss questions that may have arisen after working with the scoring rubric to develop the action plan
• IMPORTANT - use the collaboration page as the repository of all of your work for this assignment. To make it more readable, create sub-headings that make sense for your revision project.
  

Evaluating Sources (20)
Instructor highlights key components of source evaluation from collaboration pages Comments/Observations/Questions

Summary and Paraphrase Discussions (10)
Instructor highlights work

Time for work on Wikipedia Articles (75)
The editing and revision work for the Wikipedia article must be completed by the beginning of class on Wednesday, July 8.

Day Nine Assignments

For next class

1) Find two sources that could be used in your Wikipedia article and meet the Wikipedia criteria for a verifiable and credible source

Post an MLA Works Cited for these two sources on your collaboration page. Under the Works Cited entry, write a brief (150 words or more) evaluation of each source based on the criteria at one of these sites:

• Evaluating Sources online: Four Criteria - OWL @ Purdue
• Wikipedia: Verifiability
• Wikipedia: Reliable Sources

2)List at least 3-4 specific next steps on your collaboration page and assign these tasks to group members with expected due dates

3) Review the spdq assignment from day 8 and complete the Discussion assignments (Summary Practice 1 and Paraphrase Practice 1).

Instructor Availability

Just a quick note to let you know that I'll be away from my computer until Sunday morning. If you have questions about your revisions, please do email me, but know that I won't be able to respond to your questions until Sunday morning.

Photograph by Eric Geistler, BWCAW, May, 2009

Wikipedia Feature Article Analysis Rough Draft Instructor's Comments

The instructor's comments have been sent to you as an .mp3 email attachment. Please check your email. If you submitted a rough draft on time, but did not receive an email with comments from me, please let me know as soon as possible.

Day Eight Assignments

The revision of the Wikipedia Feature Article Analysis is due by the beginning of class on Monday, June 29 (and I encourage you to send it to me prior to the deadline). Send the complete revision - essay and Works Cited page in one document - as an email attachment to Michael.Kuhne@minneapolis.edu.

If you did NOT finish the two Discussions ("Summary Practice I" and "Paraphrase Practice I"), I ask that you complete them (both the posting and the reply) by the beginning of class on Wednesday, July 1).

Day Nine Class Notes

Reflecting on the Wikipedia Feature Article Analysis (15)

What went well? What's still a challenge?


Wikipedia Article Assignment(15)

Review Assignment Definition
Open the wiki in a new tab or window
Ask one question in the comment section below the assignment.

Discuss grading rubric.: we've never done this assignment before - do you have any suggestions about what the grading rubric should include? How much attempted change to an article do you think would be reasonable? How should we judge that change? Quantity? Quality? Which criteria?

Find another potential Wikipedia article (10)

Wikipedia Article Fair (50)
-work from the instructor's work station
-name the article
-what interests you about the article?
-what is wrong/incomplete about the article?

Looking ahead to the final 20 minutes today - decisions about the article

Wikipedia resources (10)

What else have you found within Wikipedia that is useful?
Please add your resources to the Wikipedia Resources page on the course wiki

Evaluating Sources
Evaluating Sources: Four Criteria - OWL @ Purdue
Activity - find an external source (external to Wikipedia) that you think would be a good one to link to your Wikipedia article (from the WFAA or a new article).
Take notes of this (include all pertinent publishing information - MLA Works Cited entry) resource, and write (handwritten or computer generated) a short evaluation of the source. We will use this information in class on Wednesday.

Final 20 minutes - Making Article Decisions
which article?
individually or collaboratively?
next steps on the new article wiki

Day Eight Class Notes

Peer Response Groups (50)

Get in peer response groups

Pick the person whose writing will be discussed first--everyone responds to first question from that writer--everyone responds to second question--third question

Move to the questions in the Wikipedia Feature Article Analysis peer response guidelines--everyone responds to 1.1--everyone responds to 1.2 and so on through 2.1 and 2.2

Begin the process again with the next group member

Write notes about helpful information from this discussion

Addressing the Revision of the Feature Article Analysis Essay
Return to the Instructor Sampling Discussion (15)

Instructor's comments sent this morning as an audio file email attachment

Sampling (25)

• Thesis statements (Cody and Abdirahman)
• Analytical body paragraphs (claim - evidence - explanation -closing) (Terry's 3rd and 4th body paragraphs)
• Addressing summaries, paraphrasing, and direct quotes

Creating Accurate Works Cited Entries for Wikipedia pages

Wikipedia: Citing Wikipedia - MLA style guide (25)

Use Diana Hacker's page (Work of Art) to help guide the creation of a Works Cited entry for a photograph.

Making clear connections between the first piece of information presented in the Work Cited entry and how that information is communicated in the in-text citation.

Task: Return to the Wikipedia Feature Article Analysis peer response and final draft wiki page
Edit - draft your Works Cited page (discuss formating challenges) - save.


Practice summarizing and paraphrasing
Common problems appearing in drafts (40)

-ineffective signal phrasing to indicate HOW the source is being cited

-text appearing as a summary or paraphrase with key words or phrases from the original

Tips for summarizing
* Carefully read the text you are summarizing
* Write the main idea of each paragraph in your own words
* If some paragraphs have similar ideas or the same idea, write one idea for this group of paragraphs
* Write the main idea of the entire passage in your own words

Combine these lists of ideas into a summary that includes
* one sentence that states the main idea of the entire text
* one sentence for each of the key points from the individuals paragraphs or groups of paragraphs that support the main idea.
* an in-text citation for the source of the summarized information

Things generally left out of summaries
* examples
* quotes

• How to Summarize (University of Pittsburgh)


• Learn to Summarize (University of Houston- Victoria)


• Summary: using it wisely (University of North Carolina)
  
  

Tips for paraphrasing

• Carefully read the text you are paraphrasing


• while looking at the paraphrase, write a 4 word summary of each sentence in the text in your own words


• Put away the original text


• Using your 4 word summaries, explain the main ideas of the passage by writing sentences in your own words

Check your version against the original:

1. does it convey the correct ideas?


2. Does it use any exact quotes?


3. Does it too closely mimic the sentence structure of the original?
   
   

• If you find exact quotes, place them in quotation marks and include an in-text citation * Include an in-text citation for the entire paraphrase
  


• Paraphrasing (Duke University)


• Paraphrase and Summary (University of Toronto)


• Successful vs. unsuccessful paraphrases (UW-Madison)


• Paraphrase: Write It in Your Own Words (Purdue University)


• Paraphrase or Quotation? (Monash University)
  

Discussion - Summary Practice 1 and Paraphrase Practice 1

Photograph attribution: Pear-2-Pear by Fab:o Fo:s

Day Seven Assignments

These assignments are due at the beginning of class on Day Eight:

1) Read and respond to the rough drafts in your small peer response group. Use the peer response guidelines to direct your responses.

Day Seven Class Notes

Peer response guidelines

Discuss process and Wikipedia Feature Article Analysis peer response guidelines

Add three questions about your rough draft for your peer response group to answer at the end of your rough draft




Norming

Get volunteer

Small groups respond to specific questions

Summary of norming and questions

Scrap Paper Evidence Exercise

Writer identifies a claim in need of (better) evidence

On a scrap of paper, write
--your name
--the name of the Wikipedia article you are discussing
--the claim for which you need better evidence

Instructor gathers and re-distributes to students working in pairs

Partners must then find evidence for the claim

When complete, partners return scrap - with evidence - to the original writer-- and discuss

Instructor Sampling for explanation

Instructor chooses thesis statement, claim, and evidence from rough draft and places in Discussion
Discuss

Photograph Attribution
Daniel Burka: How User Feedback Influences Design
by gr3m]

Day Six Assignments

These assignments are due by the beginning of Day Seven (unless otherwise noted).

The revision of the Wikipedia Debate essay should be sent to Michael.Kuhne@minneapolis.edu as an email attachment (not within the body of the email, please), and this is due by noon on Monday, June 22. We will be doing some work with these revisions in class, so it is important that you have them completed and sent.

The rough draft of the Wikipedia Feature Article Analysis is due by noon on Monday, June 22. Please post your draft within your small peer response group (Michael has edited and create new pages for each individual rough draft).

Day Six Class Notes

The revision of the Wikipedia Debate essay is due by noon on Monday, June 22.
Please send your revision as an email attachment to Michael.Kuhne@minneapolis.edu.

Review the expectations for the revision:

• focused (750 word minimum)


• clear thesis (sub-claims are a plus, but not required)


• focused analytical body paragraphs (claim-evidence-explanation-closing)


• Cite some from the four Wikipedia Debate articles or the three videos that we watched in class AND a Wikipedia page


• Produce a Works Cited page (good faith effort)


• keep it simple and direct

Today's goal

Understand the organization of
the Wikipedia Feature Article Analysis
-- read and discuss

Download the Wikipedia Feature Article Drafting Sheet - we will use this to guide our work today.

Which criteria for a featured article does this article fail to meet?

Create a thesis statement
-- share thesis statement with one other person
-- does it follow the format suggestion in the Wikipedia Feature Article Analysis assignment?
-- is it arguable and focused?

Based on the thesis, what are the claims for the body paragraphs?

Create an outline of the claims for the body paragraphs
--large group discussion

Find evidence in your chosen non-feature article to support each claim

By the end of class, everyone should have a thesis statement, a series of claims supporting the thesis statement, and evidence to support each of these claims

[photo: Chalk Outline by rbieber]

Check your email

Please check your email. As of 3:30 on Monday, June 15, I have sent all of you an email with my comments about your Wikipedia Debate rough draft. Those comments are contained within the .mp3 file that I attached to the email. If you did not receive that email, please inform me via email at Michael.Kuhne@minneapolis.edu.

Also, if you are having trouble editing the course wiki, one trouble-shooting approach is to open the course wiki in a new tab or window (it doesn't work as effectively when one tries to edit when the course wiki is presented through the course's D2L screen).

Day Five Assignments

These assignments are due at the beginning of Day Six.

1) Continue working on your Wikipedia Debate essay revision - it is due by noon on Monday, June 22. Submit the revision as an email attachment to Michael.Kuhne@minneapolis.edu

2) Review the Wikipedia Feature Article Analysis assignment definition

Day Five Class Notes

Announcements

• Extend deadline to respond to small peer response group drafts - Tuesday, June 16, noon.
• Extend deadline for revision of Wikipedia Debate essay - Monday, June 22, noon.
• (Send your revised draft as an attachment to Michael.Kuhne@minneapolis.edu)

Small Peer Response Group Conferences

Instructor's Focus for the Wikipedia Debate essay (10 minutes)

• clear organization of the essay (introduction, body, conclusion)
• a concise lead and a focused thesis statement (with sub-claims is a plus)
• focused analytical body paragraphs (claim - evidence - explanation - closing)
• improvements with MLA (introductions to sources, signal phrases, punctuation/formatting, in-text citations)
• A good faith effort with the Works Cited page

The Small Peer Response Group Process (5)

• move into your small peer response groups (you may need to have computers on and the essays in front of you; that's fine)
• one person volunteers to have his or her essay critiqued
• one person volunteers to begin critiquing
• in your discussions, stay focused on the items noted above
• don't simply draw attention to an error or omission - make concrete suggestions for how the writer can improve the essay
• when one person is done, move on to the next person

Small peer response group conferences (40 minutes)

revision plan (10)

• what you need to do
• when you are going to do it

The revision deadline has been extended to Monday, 22 June, by noon. (please note, however, that the rough draft deadline for the Wikipedia Feature Article Analysis is also Monday, June 22; plan your time accordingly).

Submit the revised Wikipedia Debate essay as an email attachment to Michael.Kuhne@minneapolis.edu

Instructor Sampling (20 minutes)

• Focused lead/hook (Aaron and Biniam)
• Clear thesis with sub-claims (Jordana)
• Analytical Body Paragraphs and use of MLA (Keira)

Wikipedia Feature Article Analysis

Begin discussion of next major writing assignment: Wikipedia Feature Article Analysis (60 min)

Search--Find out what a Feature Article is in Wikipedia

--view criteria
--discuss criteria

• are they manageable? reasonable?
• what don't you understand?

Find a feature article about a topic that interests you
-- read it
-- identify how this article meets three of the criteria (directed writing)
-- pair discussion

Find a non-feature article about a topic that interests you
-- read it
-- identify three criteria which this article does not meet (directed writing)
-- pair discussion

Large group discussion
How do wikipedians meet the standards established in the criteria?

Day Four Assignments

These assignments are due at the beginning of Day Five.

1) Finish reviewing and responding to the drafts within your Peer Response Group. Work in a a new window or tab on your computer when editing the your peers' drafts (rather than trying to edit from within course wiki on the D2L page). Place this URL in the address bar of the new window or tab: http://engl1111.pbworks.com/Wikipedia+Debate+peer+response+and+final+drafts-+Kuhne

2) Read and review the Wikipedia Feature Article Analysis assignment definition.

Day Four Class Notes

Housekeeping

Organize groups and explain future group process (30 min)
Upload Wikipedia Debate drafts to course wiki.
Discuss process and issues with code ("cleaning" documents by using Notepad (.txt); copy-and-paste the .txt. version into wiki) and wiki.

Peer Response

Read Peer Response Overview

Discuss process and Wikipedia Debate peer response guidelines
--using color (highlighting and font) for editing; the comments function

In-class norming and practice peer response (groups and individual)

MLA

(Using drafts)

signal phrases
punctuation
in-text citation

• In-text Citations: The Basics (Purdue University)
• Citing sources in the text (Cornell University)
• Documenting Sources: MLA In-Text Citations (dianahacker.com)

Works Cited

Introduction to summarizing, paraphrasing, quoting.

For suggestions about the art of summarizing check out the following resources:

• How to Summarize (University of Pittsburgh)
• Learn to Summarize (University of Houston- Victoria)
• Summary: using it wisely (University of North Carolina)

Check out these resources for more information on paraphrasing:

• Paraphrasing (Duke University)
• Paraphrase and Summary (University of Toronto)
• Successful vs. unsuccessful paraphrases (UW-Madison)
• Paraphrase: Write it in your own words (Purdue University)
• Paraphrase or Quotation? (Monash University)

[photo: audience by Herr Josh]

Day Three Assignments

This is what you must have completed for Day Four:

-Make sure you have access to a digital copy of your Wikipedia Debate draft at the beginning of class (e.g. flash drive, email attachment, and so on). We will be loading them to the course wiki at the beginning of class.

Day Three Class Notes

Housekeeping: Did everyone get registered with Wikipedia?

Sample paragraphs from the Practice Analytical Paragraph Discussion for the analytical paragraph structure and discuss. (35 minutes total)

Based on class discussion, make changes to your post in the Practice Analytical Paragraph Discussion using the Edit function in D2L.
--Questions about analytical paragraph structure?

Prewriting (20 minutes)--Explore a position regarding Wikipedia.

Ex: As we move from seeing Wikipedia as only a resource to an online
intellectual community, students are more than ready to accompany us.

Ex: Wikipedia is an excellent place to start research.

Topic and Comment: Arguable? Focused?
Practice writing thesis statements.

Share with one other person.
-Can you see the topic and comment clearly?
-Is this an arguable statement?
-Is it focused?
-Write thesis statements on white board and discuss/revise as class

If time allows - University of North Carolina thesis statements

If time allows - MLA--introducing signal phrases, punctuation, and in-text citations.

Day Two Assignments

This is what you must do for Day Three:

1. Return to the Wikipedia tutorial and review the rest of the tutorial pages (formatting, talk pages, and wrap-up) (20)
2. Review again the analytical paragraph presentation - you can find this in the Course D2L within the Content feature (15)
3. Read carefully the Wikipedia Debate assignment definition (15)
4. Do the Practice Analytical Paragraph Discussion (Course D2L – Discussion): This is due by 8:00 am on Monday, June 8.